Well, in this case I just absolutely was at a loss for words. According to research the implication of the personal data protection and electronic documents act initiated in Canada made it illegal for banks and private companies to use hidden security cameras or other kinds of security cameras in their establishment.
I thought I was reading wrong, however it's true. According to the act it is against the law to collect facts or photograph, which consists of the use of security cameras, without the person's written consent. This is really weird to me. So that you can use a security camera you've got to have the consent of your customers. These financial institutions and banks surely understand the risk they're taking don't they?
Without the use of security cameras, they are forced to rely solely on witnesses that are around. And if you'll find none this means that whoever decided to break into the financial institution will be almost impossible to discover, This is also going to make it tough on authorities to investigate, the only real leads they'll be able to go on, will be witnesses also along with fingerprints, which is if the suspects didn't wear gloves. This act that has been passed ought to be re thought on the behalf on the Canadians. They are bound to lose dollars and if it's the notion to protect the privacy of the people today, then the people today will need to speak out. I wonder just how a lot of of them like the concept of their funds going unprotected because of this new act that has been set into place.
Could you imagine somebody walking into a financial institution or bank inside the United States asking the bank president to shut off their security camera mainly because it violates the individual's privacy rights? Authorities in Canada disagree with this new act. They say with out the use of security cameras it'll hinder their efforts and compromise investigations on bank theft or property theft, as well as shoplifters to say the least.
They also believe that without the ability to make use of security cameras also as other surveillance, the crime rate will initially rise in Canada. There's a clause in this act however, it states that security cameras could and really should be employed in public locations where safety is an issue.
This is really a scenario which is undoubtedly headed for a large downfall. Security cameras supply assistance not only for safety situations, but also aid authorities in their investigations. Without the use of security cameras this enables possible thieves and criminals to go significantly farther than they usually would if they knew the security cameras had been present and in use.
All this is doing is sending a negative message. If an individual goes into a convenience store, they could in fact ask that the security camera be turned off whilst they were on the premises. The act does not say security cameras aren't allowed to be installed or on the premises, it just states that you can not use them.
Author Resource:
Charles has been writing on the web for over 7 years. His latest writings at http://www.panasonicblurayplayer.net covers the panasonic blu ray player range and gives information and advice about the players.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.look4articles.com/images/rss.jpg "XML Feed For RSS")